Facultative vs. Treaty Reinsurance: What's the Difference? (2024)

Facultative vs. Treaty Reinsurance: An Overview

Facultative reinsurance and reinsurance treaties are two types of reinsurance contracts. When it comes to facultative reinsurance, the main insurer covers one risk or a series of risks held in its own books. Treaty reinsurance, on the other hand, is insurance purchased by an insurer from another company. With facultative reinsurance, the reinsurer can review the risks involved in an insurance policy and either accept or reject them. But the reinsurer in a treaty reinsurance policy, on the other hand, generally accepts all the risks involved with certain policies.

Key Takeaways

  • Facultative and treaty reinsurance are both forms of reinsurance.
  • Facultative reinsuranceis reinsurance for a single risk or a defined package of risks.
  • Facultative reinsurance occurs whenever the reinsurance company insists on performing its own underwriting for some or all the policies to be reinsured.
  • The ceding company in treaty reinsurance agrees to cede all risks to the reinsurer.
  • The reinsurer in treaty reinsurance agrees to cover all risks, even though the reinsurer hasn't performed individual underwriting for each policy.

Facultative vs. Treaty Reinsurance: What's the Difference? (1)

Facultative Reinsurance

Facultative reinsurance is usually the simplest way for an insurer to obtain reinsurance protection. These policies are also the easiest to tailor to specific circ*mstances.

Facultative reinsuranceis reinsurance purchased by an insurer for a single risk or a defined package of risks. Usually a one-off transaction, it occurs whenever the reinsurance company insists on performing its own underwriting for some or all the policies to be reinsured. Under these agreements, each facultatively underwritten policy is considered a singletransaction, not lumped together by class. Such reinsurance contracts are usually less attractive to the ceding company, which may be forced to retain only the riskiest policies.

Suppose a standard insurance provider issues a policy on major commercial real estate, such as a large corporate office building. The policy is written for $35 million, meaning the original insurer faces a potential $35 million in liability if the building is badly damaged. But the insurer believes it cannot afford to pay out more than $25 million. So before even agreeing to issue the policy, the insurer must look for facultative reinsurance and try the market until it gets takers for the remaining $10 million. The insurer might get pieces of the $10 million from 10 different reinsurers. But without that, it cannot agree to issue the policy. Once it has the agreement from the companies to cover the $10 million and is confident it can potentially cover the full amount should a claim come in, it can issue the policy.

Treaty Reinsurance

Treaty reinsurance occurs whenever the ceding company agrees to cede all risks within a specific class of insurance policies to the reinsurance company. In turn, the reinsurance company agrees to indemnify the ceding company of all risks therein, even though the reinsurance company has not performed individual underwriting for each policy. The reinsurance often applies even to those policies that have not yet been written, so long as they pertain to the pre-agreed class.

The most important characteristic of a treaty agreement is the lack of individual underwriting on behalf of the assuming insurer. This structure transfers underwriting risks from the ceding company to the assuming company, leaving the assuming company exposed to the possibility that the initial underwriting process did not adequately evaluate the risks to be insured.

There are different kinds of treaty agreements. The most common is called proportional treaties, in which a percentage of the ceding insurer's original policies is reinsured, up to a limit. Any policies written in excess of the limit are not to be covered by the reinsurance treaty.

For example, one reinsurance company may agree to indemnify 75% of the original insurer's automobile policies—up to a $100 million limit. This means the ceding company is not indemnified for $25 million of the first $100 million in auto policies written under the agreement. That $25 million is known as the ceding company's retention limit. If the ceding company writes $200 million worth of automobile insurance, it retains $25 million from the first $100 million and all of the subsequent $100 million, unless it arranges a surplus treaty. Generally speaking, reinsurance policy premiums are lower when retention limits are higher.

Special Considerations

Reinsurance companies offer insurance to other insurers, safeguarding against circ*mstances when the traditional insurer does not have enough money to pay out all of the claims against its written policies. Reinsurance contracts take place between a reinsurer or assuming company, and the reinsured or ceding company. In effect, a standard insurance provider can spread its own risk of loss even further by entering into a reinsurance contract.

Reinsurance companies provide coverage to other insurers that can't pay out all of the claims against their written policies.

In a traditional insurance arrangement, the risk of loss is spread among many different policyholders, each of whom pays a premium to the insurer in exchange for the insurer's protection against some uncertain potential event. It is a business model that works whenever the sum of received premiums from all members exceeds the amount paid out on insurance claims against the policies. There are times, however, when the amount paid out in claims by the insurer exceeds the sum of money received from policyholder premiums. In such instances, it is the insurer who faces the greatest risk of loss.

Facultative vs. Treaty Reinsurance: What's the Difference? (2024)


Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Zonia Mosciski DO

Last Updated:

Views: 5924

Rating: 4 / 5 (51 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Zonia Mosciski DO

Birthday: 1996-05-16

Address: Suite 228 919 Deana Ford, Lake Meridithberg, NE 60017-4257

Phone: +2613987384138

Job: Chief Retail Officer

Hobby: Tai chi, Dowsing, Poi, Letterboxing, Watching movies, Video gaming, Singing

Introduction: My name is Zonia Mosciski DO, I am a enchanting, joyous, lovely, successful, hilarious, tender, outstanding person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.