What are the common sources of error and bias in sensor calibration and validation? (2024)

Calibration error is the difference between the actual value of a physical quantity and the value measured by a sensor. It can result from various factors, such as sensor drift, nonlinearity, hysteresis, noise, interference, or environmental conditions. Calibration error can be reduced by using appropriate calibration methods, standards, and procedures, and by performing regular calibration checks and adjustments.

Validation error is the difference between the expected value of a physical quantity and the value estimated by a sensor model or algorithm. It can result from various factors, such as model complexity, overfitting, underfitting, outliers, or assumptions. Validation error can be reduced by using appropriate validation methods, data sets, and metrics, and by performing cross-validation, sensitivity analysis, or error propagation.

Measurement bias is the systematic deviation of a sensor measurement from the true value of a physical quantity. It can result from various factors, such as sensor offset, scale factor, resolution, or calibration error. Measurement bias can be corrected by using appropriate calibration methods, standards, and procedures, and by applying bias compensation or correction techniques.

Sampling bias is the systematic deviation of a sample of sensor measurements from the population of sensor measurements. It can result from various factors, such as sampling frequency, duration, location, or method. Sampling bias can affect the representativeness and generalizability of sensor data and models. Sampling bias can be avoided or minimized by using appropriate sampling methods, designs, and criteria, and by applying sampling correction or weighting techniques.

Algorithm bias is the systematic deviation of a sensor model or algorithm output from the expected or desired output. It can result from various factors, such as algorithm design, implementation, optimization, or validation. Algorithm bias can affect the accuracy and fairness of sensor data and models. Algorithm bias can be detected and mitigated by using appropriate algorithm methods, parameters, and tests, and by applying algorithm correction or auditing techniques.

Human bias is the systematic deviation of a human judgment or decision from the objective or rational judgment or decision. It can result from various factors, such as cognitive biases, heuristics, preferences, or emotions. Human bias can affect the quality and ethics of sensor data and models. Human bias can be prevented or reduced by using appropriate human methods, standards, and protocols, and by applying human feedback or oversight techniques.

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Embedded Software

+ Follow

Thanks for your feedback

Your feedback is private. Like or react to bring the conversation to your network.